Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 07:44 +0100, David Tardon wrote:
... exists yet, it just points to a nonexistent file. LibO sees the
(symlink) file, so it doesn't allow to import a template with the same
name, but it cannot open it as a template, so it doesn't list it in the
dialog. Elementary, my dear Watson.
Yes well it wasn't my meaning to complain on that, that part's quite
logic.

What I wondered was if it would be a Good Idea or a Bad Idea to be able
to just import a template overwriting an existing one with the same
name, instead of having to do the double operation of 1) deleting the
old template 2) importing the new template?

OK, maybe warning the user first? I just think it's a bit cumbersome
having to delete it manually before allowing the import...


Well, it was you who decided to circumvent the template management
system, so it is your problem to ensure it is in consistent state...
hehe it is.


best
Arno

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.