On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 3:15 AM, Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@novell.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-01-28 at 10:02 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Well, we may need to adapt the tools computing the stats and credits to
take this into account. We will need to get all the names pretty easily
from git to get everyone properly thanked. Isn't the sign-off way the
best one?
Signed off typically means, not "I also wrote this", but "I reviewed
this, and I certify its origin" - I think we want to retain the latter
meaning.
So - I would be inclined to have some different way just for Soeren and
his (thus far anonymous) friend ;-) either that - or we encourage them
to alternate credits in their patches (which might be easier) :-)
Yeah, I think alternate credit is probably the easiest route here.
Norbert
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.