On Tue, 2011-01-04 at 22:04 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hello hackers,
I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the
license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's
description.xml //simple-license[@suppress-if-required].
http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fregistration.2Fsimple-license
According to this wiki page, this feature has been introduced in OOo
3.3... which isn't released yet.
Do you have any strong opinion against that? I would need this kind of
unconditional skip to run unopkg from within ooeclipse... where people
should develop their extensions and know the license ;)
IMO the principle of lease surprise dictates that, when given
--suppress-license, it should suppress license unconditionally no matter
what some file in undisclosed location has in it.
So, I'm with you on that.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.