Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

Hello hackers,

I would like to make the --suppress-license option of unopkg skip the
license in all cases instead of depending on what is in the extension's
description.xml //simple-license[@suppress-if-required].

http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/Extensions/Description_of_XML_Elements#Element_.2Fdescription.2Fregistration.2Fsimple-license

According to this wiki page, this feature has been introduced in OOo
3.3... which isn't released yet.

Do you have any strong opinion against that? I would need this kind of
unconditional skip to run unopkg from within ooeclipse... where people
should develop their extensions and know the license ;)

Regards,

-- 
Cédric Bosdonnat
LibreOffice hacker
http://documentfoundation.org
OOo Eclipse Integration developer
http://cedric.bosdonnat.free.fr

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.