Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Sophie

I have a demand on this subject.

I don't have enough energy to dedicate to the translation of two large softwares like LibO and OO. I had already made my choice to stick with LibreOffice.

So someone else will take care of OO. When it come to import the developments from OO to LibO it will be important to flag *all new OO strings* (m90) as fuzzy or untranslated, even if they are translated already, so that I can revise and aprove for LibreOffice. Otherwise LibreOffice will bear inconsistencies because of an external influence.

It may be quite hard to make difference between a *new* (m90) translated string and an old one.

Thanks

Olivier


Em 28-12-2010 07:45, Sophie Gautier escreveu:
Hi all,

Now that the 3.3 localization is over for LibO too, could we plan an
update of the localization files and with which version of OOo shall we
update the files to get in sync.

There is already some work to be done (approx 7000 words up to
DEV300m90), so the sooner we know the better for us to organize our time
between the fixes and the new translations.

Thanks in advance
Kind regards
Sophie


--
Olivier Hallot
Founder, Steering Commitee Member - The Document Foundation
Translation Leader for Brazilian Portuguese

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.