Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Regardless if its spam posting or editing of a pages its all moderated so if there is spam its automatically denied. also they have it to where you have to have a login to be able to do any editing. CAPTCHA can also help mitigate spam and bots when users sign up to be able to do any editing of any wiki page.

On 13/12/2010 13:00, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-13 at 18:57 +0800, David Nelson wrote:
Personally, I like the idea of editing the help on the wiki rather than offline.
But could the problem be solved by creating a user group on the wiki and
only allowing editing rights for that group's users? Then we could add selected
devs, i10n and docs people to that group?
        Sure, by inspection, it is a trivial solution to this problem of
random / un-controlled user editing / spamming - notice the help is not
in the existing wiki, but a separate one anyway.

        OTOH - it seems like we have a tooling gap with the existing plan, so -
lets see where that goes. It may even be that different languages prefer
different approaches to help editing, wiki or not wiki - who knows; but
the tool is there, and (to me) looks quite cool :-) and it provides
useful search, and cross-linking for read-only on-line help today.

        ATB,

                Michael.



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.