On Tuesday 30 of November 2010, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Additionally, I think most classes don't necessarily need detailed
docs for all methods in the first place (which may also hurt later
merging from OOo), but would already benefit from a two-line
"mission statement" at class level (of course plus some module-level
overview of "what's inside").
 I beg to differ. After having years of experience using a nice, intuitive and 
well-documented APIs (Qt,KDE), and being used to that, I sometimes rather 
suffer getting familiar with this codebase. Most APIs are not documented at 
all (or at most poorly, or in German, which is about the same in practice for 
many people). This is futher made worse by some APIs not being very intuitive 
(cryptic abbreviations, unclear naming, obsolete idiosyncracies, duplication, 
basic things being needlessly complicated).
 This could be a significant factor for new possible contributors. While 
patches removing dead code or similar certainly help too, the codebase can 
move forward only by people writing new code, and that requires understanding 
of the existing code.
 So I find any suggesting that docs are not necessary (or valueing merging 
higher) to be eventually shooting ourselves in the foot.
-- 
 Lubos Lunak
 l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.