Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 11/03/2010 04:06 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 14:30 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 12:47 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
        Quite; cf. such uncertainty - it probably makes considerable sense to
look into a migration strategy from Java to (insert anything else). Some
candidates might be python for the more scripty pieces (though I hate
non-typed languages), and/or native C++.

What about the existing Java extensions? Quite a lot of people are using
Java to either writer extensions or use UNO Java bridge from an external
application.

Its not, at least that's my understanding, about removing the java-uno
bridge, or removing the *ability* to support Java. Its the thought to
consider not defaulting to *require* Java for the built-in bits, which
probably mostly boils down to defaulting base to a different backend for
file based databases and a redo an occasional wizard here and there.

Out of the over 3400 java files in the repos, over half seem to be tests (some in directories called test/ others in qa/ - is there a difference?), and over 200 are wizard related, so it seems a lot of UI work to port these if they are all indeed part of the default install.

Jani


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.