Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java

Michael Meeks <michael.meeks -AT- novell.com>
Wed, 03 Nov 2010 15:56:44 -0400


On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 07:50 -0600, Tor Lillqvist wrote:

Another even wilder idea would be to translate the Java bytecode
to .NET bytecode for the Windows case...


        I suspect at this point the external pundits start screaming all at
once  ;-) So - I would prefer using python, or native C++ for this sort
of stuff.

        We have to solve all the xplat problems of C++ ourselves for the OO.o
core, so there is no extra problem for bundled pieces.

        HTH,

                Michael.

-- 
 michael.meeks@novell.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot

Context

[Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Cesare Leonardi
- Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Constantin Makshin
- Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Caolán McNamara
  - Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Michael Meeks
    - Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Cedric Bosdonnat
      - Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Tor Lillqvist
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Sebastian Spaeth
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Tor Lillqvist
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Michael Meeks
      - Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Caolán McNamara
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] LibreOffice and Java · Jani Monoses

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.