On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 01:28 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,
I saw some comments removed, which had a issue number. But I'm not sure
about doing that. I think it is useful to know, why the code has been
changed and why in that particular way and issues sometimes contain a
lot of additional information. I agree that the type "internal task" is
useless, because we have no access to it. But links to issues in the
normal issue tracker should not be deleted.
Yes, Regina raises a good point.
Those comments that include "issue numbers" - numbers that look like
#i12345#, i#12345 should probably be left behind since they can be
informative.
For those of you who are not familiar, an issue number corresponds with
a bug filed against OpenOffice.org, which can be traced back as
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12345
with the '12345' being the issue number in this case.
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, Go-OO hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.