Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 01:28 +0200, Regina Henschel wrote:
Hi all,

I saw some comments removed, which had a issue number. But I'm not sure 
about doing that. I think it is useful to know, why the code has been 
changed and why in that particular way and issues sometimes contain a 
lot of additional information. I agree that the type "internal task" is 
useless, because we have no access to it. But links to issues in the 
normal issue tracker should not be deleted.

Yes, Regina raises a good point.

Those comments that include "issue numbers" - numbers that look like
#i12345#, i#12345 should probably be left behind since they can be
informative.

For those of you who are not familiar, an issue number corresponds with
a bug filed against OpenOffice.org, which can be traced back as 

http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=12345

with the '12345' being the issue number in this case.

Kohei

-- 
Kohei Yoshida, Go-OO hacker, Calc
<kyoshida@novell.com>


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.