On 15/02/2023 21:41, Eyal Rozenberg wrote:
objections or claims which I would probably be able to convincingly
rebut or disprove are stated and accepted with no retort or objection.
An RFE masquerading as a bug report has to stand on its own merits.
It has to provide a number of datapoints:
* What the benefits of the enhancement are;
* What the downsides of the enhancement are;
* How to minimize the negative impact of those downsides;
* How to minimize the negative impact of the enhancement;
* Reasons why the enhancement would be declined;
** Explain why the reasons for declining the enhancement are
insufficient to warrant doing so;
* Present multiple use-cases showing how the enhancement aids usage;
* Provide alternative choices of action to attain the desired outcome(s)
that the RFE requests;
* Demonstrate an understanding of how and why the current framework exists;
jonathon
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.