What if all notebookbar options were separated into individual widgets that could be rearranged
into whatever order that the user wanted? The standard toolbar does kind of have that all ready.
The notebookbar could then be applied as the main tool section, additional toolbars, and the
sidebar, configured by presets and user preference.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is magic to those who do not understand it.-A variation on
Clarke's Third Law
-------- Original message --------From: "kainz.a" <kainz.a@gmail.com> Date: 3/25/18 3:08 PM
(GMT-06:00) To: Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> Cc: LibO Design
<design@global.libreoffice.org>, Kshitij Pathania <kshitijpathania@gmail.com> Subject: Re:
[libreoffice-design] Merged Toolbar/Notebookbar menu
What's the difference between toolbars, sidebar and notebookbars. They are
different from a dev point of view but from a user perspective they
shouldn't be separate.
So from my point of view no prefix
but as you ordinary don't want to switch the UI often (you have one
work-flow) I'm for a section in the configuration dialog where there is
also some explanation.
In addition the section is the menubar is needed (also for some notebookbar
implementation this drop down list was used).
Add the different layouts into the configuration dialog give also the
information what's a notebookbar and a standard toolbar (the icon size can
be different configured).
Cheers
Andreas_K
2018-03-25 21:02 GMT+02:00 Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com>:
Hello,
in the patch https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/49575/ Kshitij is working
on issue tdf#115131 (merging the two menu flavors). The patch works find
but we stumbled over the label question. Right now it looks like this
Toolbar
Standard
Single
Sidebar
- separator -
Notebookbar > Contextual groups
Notebookbar > Contextual single
Notebookbar > Tabbed
My comment was to remove the prefix but Jay disagreed with the remark that
such a combined menu would better be called UI Layout. The change may look
like this
UI Layout
Standard
Single
Sidebar
- separator -
Contextual groups
Contextual single
Tabbed
Now I wonder how users may read "UI Layout > Single", for instance. And
calling it "Single Toolbar" is also not that nice thinking about "Standard"
or "Standard Toolbar" (and suffixes are similarly awkward as prefixes).
I still prefer this plain solution as any prefix is a clear indicator for
bad usability (meaning the items are actually meant for a submenu). Any
opinion?
Cheers,
Heiko
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-
unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.