On Monday, 25 January 2016 18:47:32 CET you wrote:
Sorry for nitpicking but is there any strong reasons why this text is
not on
our wiki instead of a US coppration now owning this content? I know
everyone can access it but it is not on our servers.
It got into habits for the UX people to draft stuff on Google. I don't
care
too much whether the discussion is on the etherpad or GDoc. What fits
better
Andreas and the other people is fine to me. The wiki, however, is the
last
place for information, meaning to grave in stones there.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.