I'm not against this idea at all. It seems perfectly reasonable. Why light blue, instead of a light grey? This is my first time responding to a thread in this group; am I allowed to do so? On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Pedro <pedlino@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all Displaying Non-printing characters is a commonly used feature by people formatting documents (or cleaning up oddly formatted text). I think it's a great idea to have the symbols in another colour. But Light Blue is hard to see (especially in thin fonts) or maybe it's just my eyes getting older... Wouldn't it be possible to add an option to allow the user to select the colour? (It could be Light Blue as default). Since version 4.3 is still in Beta stage the option could be added now before the change to mandatory Light Blue occurs... I can add a Feature Request in the Tracker if people agree that this makes sense... Thanks! Pedro -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Light-Blue-for-Non-printing-characters-tp4110478.html Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
-- Antonio Garcia 773.336.2259 AntonioGarciaIII@gmail.com -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted