Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


"An abomination."

"Accursed."

Using direct formatting as a reason to dislike the sidebar is ridiculous.
The sidebar can be changed, if need be. If anything, having a sidebar fits
using styles much better than a toolbar does. Let me explain: In the
toolbar, you pull styles in a list that gets in the way of the document,
which may end up covering the exact thing you are trying to format. In a
sidebar, this element would cover other controls that you aren't using at
the moment, which is fine. 

Don't misunderstand me, I use styles--they are very useful and definitely
the "right" way to do things. But we shouldn't push people into using them
until editing, using, and managing styles is at least as intuitive as direct
formatting is now. 
"> I don't like menus."
I didn't say that. I said the opposite of that.

Daniel



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/The-Sidebar-Problem-tp4094331p4095983.html
Sent from the Design mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.