Le 05/04/13 02:39 PM, Kracked_P_P---webmaster a écrit :
It was suggested that I post this updated Green "Community" Logo
version, of the brochure, to the design list. Someone suggested to me
that things were getting lost in the discussions going on, both online
and offline.
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Brochure-lo-4-letter-size--v8-green-logo--no-tdf.odt
Thanks Tim. Maybe next time we could include some "Lorem Ipsum" text
instead! :-) But, seriously, the text in this example still needs to be
corrected and is in need of some changes. So please do not look at the
text, but let's work on the template design. But please do not use the
pamphlet as is, we will be putting the text through a final proofing on
the marketing list!!!
Just to put this more into context and to put all of the suggested
pamphlet template files on one thread --
Tim has test-tried the other community pamphlet templates suggested in
our other threads and has found that, except for the "ink-saver"
pamphlet[1], where there were not problems, the other two that I had
suggested[2][3] presented problems with ink-bleed-through the page, more
expensive, and showed shadows of the other side of the page due to the
amount of black background used in the templates. I have also tried
them, but have only laser printers and could not try ink-jet. My laser
prints were not bad, but I can well imagine that the results would be
quite different on ink-jet printers which are more in use than lasers.
So, OK, let's totally eliminate my two proposals. The ink-saver
pamphlet, while it does work, is IMO, not that appealing. I am not sure
if we would be defeating the purpose of a pamphlet if the first
impression we leave is that the pamphlet is in need of "beautifying".
From a marketing point of view this would not be our objective, we want
the reader to concentrate on the pamphlet's text.
Tim is now suggesting that we go back to our original community pamphlet
template which works[4], and is not hard on ink, the bleed-through is
not a consideration.
I have changed my view on this and will agree with Tim, that we should
keep to the proven community template, with the community logo. This
will be easier on printing costs for our members/groups who wish to
print off some pamphlets, while allowing for the offset printing of our
official pamphlets.
Comments?
Cheers,
Marc
[1]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Brochure-lo-4---A4-paper-size--v4--websitelike.odt
[2]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOfficeVersion4BrochureA4WebsitelikeCommunityNoSublineAllHalfCircle.odt
[3]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:LibreOfficeVersion4BrochureA4WebsitelikeCommunityNoSublineAllHalfCirclePanel1LOLogo.odt
[4]
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Brochure-lo-4---A4-paper-size--v4--websitelike.odt
--
Marc Paré
Marc@MarcPare.com
http://www.parEntreprise.com
parEntreprise.com Supports OpenDocument Formats (ODF)
parEntreprise.com Supports http://www.LibreOffice.org
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.