Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index

Ähh I think it was intended to add the votes to the last mail, but then
people stopped doing so, so now I think it's best to just send your vote
and put everything in place later.

And yes, I completely agree: this is a little chaotic and the vote
should be redone with a voting system!


On 29/01/13 19:55, Samuel Mehrbrodt wrote:

I'm not sure how the voting system is supposed to work. I took the
last email, and added my votes to that. Others took the plain list
from the first mail and added their votes to that.
What is the right way?

Maybe an online voting system would help?


Am 29.01.2013 08:49, schrieb klaus-jürgen weghorn ol:
Hi Kévin, Samuel and all voters,

we should avoid such things like "-3".

Am 29.01.2013 08:24, schrieb Kévin PEIGNOT:
"V2" by Javier Antonio Nisa Ávila: -3

Everybody has one vote for or against and do it so.

At least doing such changes at a legal vote is making your whole vote
uncountable in mostly every country.

I will say that because the next one will do a "+100000" and a

Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
Posting guidelines + more:
List archive:
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.