Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi everyone,
I've reconsidered my stance on project "owners". (By project, I mean
whiteboard or analysis.)
My initial position was that I didn't want there to be designers who have
more power over a project than others, afraid that the meritocracy we have
would turn into a dictatorship in each project we tackle.
But it's true that it would be handy to have every project looked after. I
definitely concur with having a person who would look after a project, as
long as all the designers have equal say in every project.

So, rather than owner, I'd prefer to use the term caretaker. The caretaker
would:
a) make sure that the work on the project is progressing smoothly
b) provide updates about it at the weekly IRC chat
c) be in charge of communication with developers and other relevant
people/themes
Anything I'm missing?

The caretaker wouldn't make key decisions (those would be made on the IRC
chat), and he wouldn't even have to do any design work on the project. It
wouldn't even have to be a designer.

What do you think?

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.