Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Same here, B.

Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without the
other proposed changes, sadly.
I think I'll not do help with that (and probably be counter-productive), but
my personal taste is still for C [1].

~Paulo

[1] -
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/f/f1/LogoImprovementStep2.png
--
Paulo José O. Amaro
Estudante de Ciência da Computação / UFSJ
Webdesigner / Linked E.J.
Blogueiro / CasaTwain.com



2011/3/15 Johannes Bausch <johannes.bausch@gmail.com>

Yes, to be honest, I don't like that half-broken ligature either. Maybe I
really should only do something about the kerning.

2011/3/15 Daniel Merker <daniel.merker@wayne.edu>


My vote: B

Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't
consistent across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match
anything else.


-Daniel Merker


On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold <
bernhard@familie-dippold.at> wrote:

Hi Joey, all

I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey!

Johannes Bausch schrieb:

 Hey,

following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a
step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main
concern.


If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable
with the distinct characters.

In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the
difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but
in comparison with the present logo they felt different.

Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a
compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included in
order to create an improved visual impression.

 [...]


I compared your last proposal with the current logo here:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png
(force reload)

If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look
at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but
you'll find it).

For me it is much more important to compare the general impression
rather than the tiny modifications.

So I ask you to vote on this comparison:

Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want
to be associated with LibreOffice?



And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other
modifications except the "ffi" in the old logo?


Best regards

Bernhard

PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image
already with my voting in mind which might influence their decision...

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org List
archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org List
archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.