On Mon, 2011-01-31 at 00:41 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
Hi Drew, *
On Sun, 2011-01-30 at 23:12 +0100, Bernhard Dippold wrote:
based on a SC decision to provide logos for external use without the
subline "The Document Foundation" I created a proposal:
One comment - request.
If there is to be a 'can't change' license then it would by very nice to
have one with only the word LibreOffice, particularly for the community
supporter logo as the addition of the application icon, IMO, adds to
much width to the overall look.
I think we'll allow usage of the word alone (as it is already mentioned
in the Branding Guidelines) and provide such logos too.
But I think we have to keep enough white space around the text to keep
it distinct from the surrounding.
Do you think this is enough?
On white space generally- I've never had a problem with the white space
requirements, IMO often more then the required amount makes a better
overall look anyway. The only _problem_ I've had with the logo is due to
the width overall, and then only when forced into a small size overall.
That however is tough to avoid when the design is text based, and
dropping 'The Document Foundation' line goes a long way towards
mitigating that issue.
Thanks for putting this together,
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy