Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last


Hi all.

I'm new to this list and haven't yet gone back to catch up on everything
I missed including with respect to this thread. But I did see this:

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alex Midence" <alex.midence@gmail.com>
To: <accessibility@libreoffice.org>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 5:37 PM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] Laws and standards

<snip>

see them rewriting the code to use swt classes though.  Besides, I
think this creates issues in Gnome since swt is less accessible there
than swing.

For what it's worth, swt seems to actually work better for us (Orca)
too. What issues do you think it creates?

Take care.
--joanie (Orca project lead, GNOME Accessibility Team)


-- 
E-mail to accessibility+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/accessibility/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.