At 03:15 8/12/2010, Alex Midence wrote:
Thing is, some apps that can only be navigated with the Jaws cursor
can be scripted such that they become accessible. If the Jaws cursor
can see it, the invisible cursor can too, usually. I managed to make
some progress wtih Open Office this way.
This is great to hear, even though it is not the best solution. There
are several reasons for this:
* scripts can break when the user interface changes,
* JAWS scripts are specific to JAWS and don't help users of other
* scripts are not part of the standard download of
OpenOffice/LibreOffice, not are they downloadable from
http://www.openoffice.org/ or http://www.documentfoundation.org/ so
users need to actively search for them .
Some of the controls I could
only access with the jaws cursor might be made accessible through
hotkeys set to change from pc to invisible and then back to pc again
at the click of a key. In the end, what may happen is that Libre
Office is made to be scriptably accessible which is ok, I guess
though out of the box accessibility would be nice.
In my opinion, built-in accessibility is not just "nice", it should
be the default.
 Moreover: "Freedom Scientific does not typically accept
unsolicited offers of scripts for third party applications."
JAWS users are referred to sites such as <http://www.JFWlite.com/>
On 12/7/10, Octavian Rasnita <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Well, if an interface is accessible only by using the JAWS cursor, we can
> say that it is really inaccessible, because it is not an application that
> can be currently used.
> The edit fields where we should type strings are not accessible and the
> other controls are very hard to find with the JAWS cursor...
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Alex Midence" <email@example.com>
> To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 5:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-accessibility] Laws and standards
> SWT is indeed more accessible. I think the only parts of Libre
> Office that are in Java are those tied to the database. Most of the
> code is in c and c++, I heard. Btw, QT is somewhat supported. I
> wouldn't call it stellar but it's not impossible to navigate witha
> jaws cursor. (Mouse simulator) Idle, for instance, is in QT. I dn't
> see them rewriting the code to use swt classes though. Besides, I
> think this creates issues in Gnome since swt is less accessible there
> than swing.
> alex M
> On 12/7/10, Octavian Rasnita <email@example.com> wrote:
>> From: "Christophe Strobbe" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>>> Hi Alex,
>>> At 02:25 7/12/2010, Alex Midence wrote:
>>>>Well, my thinking is and always will be that Libre Office is better
>>>>off making itself accessible no matter what screen reader is used.
>>> That is why LibreOffice (like OpenOffice.org) needs to support
>>> accessibility APIs, keyboard access, desktop themes, etcetera. For a
>>> screen reader to work with an application, the application needs to
>>> implement the accessibility API (for example the Java Accessibility
>>> API, which is not tied to a specific operating system), and the
>>> screen reader needs to support that API. As far as I know, screen
>>> readers on Windows have generally weak support for the Java Accessibility
>> True, although the screen readers for Windows have a weak support for
>> API. The support for SWT is much better.
>> But the screen readers for Windows have a non-existent support for other
>> GUIs like Tk, GTK, QT...
>>> (Note: Java accessibility on Windows requires the Java Access Bridge.
>>> Oracle is working on a new version of this bridge that will be part
>>> of the Java Runtime Environment instead of a separate download.)
>> This will be great, but hopefully the screen readers manufacturers will
>> offer a better support for SWING.
>> JAWS for Windows offer some support for Java Access Bridge as it is now,
>> only in a virtual buffer, so the apps are seen like web pages.
>> SWING is slower than SWT anyway, and that weak support offered by JAWS
>> the apps much less responsive, but what's the most important for blind
>> programmers is that it is very hard if impossible to make the design of
>> GUI, because in the SWING apps, JAWS doesn't offer that "JAWS cursor" for
>> allowing us to "see" the position of each window control on the screen.
>> I heard that Window Eyes started to offer a better support for SWING than
>> JAWS but I haven't tested it.
>> By the way, what interface is LibreOffice using? I've tested OpenOffice
>> it was pretty accessible although I don't remember if I had Java Access
>> Bridge installed. Does it use something else than SWING?
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
"Better products and services through end-user empowerment"
www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or other "social
E-mail to email@example.com for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/accessibility/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy