(This e-mail didn't get through the first time
because I put discuss@documentfoundation.org in CC.)
At 07:41 2/12/2010, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-11-29 09:23, Christophe Strobbe a écrit :
> Hi Florian,
>
> At 12:01 28/11/2010, Florian Effenberger wrote:
>> on yesterday's LinuxDay in Austria, the request for a separate
>> accessibility mailing list came up. (...)
> (...)
This seems like quite an important developer
detail to work out right from the very start.
Are the developers aware of accessibility
concerns? Also from a marketing point of view,
if we are to market the suite to governmental
agencies subscribing to accessibility rules in
their procurement of software applications, then
we should be discussing this sooner than later.
I don't know to what extent the LibreOffice
developers are aware of accessibility.
As far as I understand, LibreOffice accessibility
doesn't start from scratch. See
<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Accessibility>.
However, the problem with using the Java
Accessibility API on Windows is that screen
readers don't support it very well. NVDA and
Window-Eyes are said to provide better support
than JAWS (which many consider to be the dominant
screen reader in the English-speaking world), but
even access with NVDA is not considered
excellent. The OpenOffice.org accessibility page
mentions plans to implement the IAccessible2 API,
but I don't know if the project ever got started on this.
Access to OpenOffice.org (I don't know if
LibreOffice has changed the UI) with VoiceOver on
Mac OS and with Orca on GNOME seems to work better.
Of course, there is more to accessibility than
screen reader access; two other important issues
are support for desktop themes (high contrast,
large font size, ...), and keyboard access (also relevant to sighted users).
(...) We could also get links to any
governmental rules/laws relating to this for reference. (...)
In the US, Section 508 is being updated; see
<http://508-255-refresh.trace.wisc.edu/content/home>.
In the EU, I know about laws and regulations
related to Web accessibility, but not about laws
and regulations for software accessibility in
general. In some EU countries, the only relevant
legislation is the general anti-discrimination
legislation, which is probably not something you
can refer to in procurement. We will have to wait
a few more years for a European standard that
defines accessibility requirements for ICT that
can be used in public procurement. (A call for
experts for a committee to write that standard
went out quite recently; see <ftp://ftp.cen.eu/PUB/Calls/M376.pdf>.)
If you want references to standards on software
accessibility, I can give you these:
* ISO 9241-171:2008 (not available for free; see
<http://www.iso.org/iso/iso_catalogue/catalogue_tc/catalogue_detail.htm?csnumber=39080>);
* ISO/IEC TR 29318 (3 parts): freely downloadable
at <http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/index.html>.
* the W3C's Authoring Tool Accessibility
Guidelines 2.0 (under development) focus on
authoring tools for Web content, but many
criteria can be generalised to authoring tools in
general (I have this in another mail if you want
it): <http://www.w3.org/TR/ATAG20/>.
The accessibility of the ODF format itself was
taken in hands when the state of Massachusetts
announced a move to the OpenDocument Format; see
for example Peter Korn's long blog post about
this at
<http://blogs.sun.com/korn/entry/massachusetts_open_document_and_accessibility>
and the OpenDocument Accessibility Guidelines by
the ODF Accessibilit SC
<http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office-accessibility>.
We really need a wikipage for this, don't we?
Best regards,
Christophe
--
Christophe Strobbe
K.U.Leuven - Dept. of Electrical Engineering - SCD
Research Group on Document Architectures
Kasteelpark Arenberg 10 bus 2442
B-3001 Leuven-Heverlee
BELGIUM
tel: +32 16 32 85 51
http://www.docarch.be/
Twitter: @RabelaisA11y
---
"Better products and services through end-user
empowerment" www.usem-net.eu - www.stand4all.eu
---
Please don't invite me to Facebook, Quechup or
other "social networks". You may have agreed to
their "privacy policy", but I haven't.
--
E-mail to accessibility+help@libreoffice.org for instructions on how to unsubscribe
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/accessibility/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Context
- [libreoffice-accessibility] Laws and standards (Re: accessibility mailing list) · Christophe Strobbe
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.