Re: [libreoffice-website] Re: about documenting infrastructure

On 2013-02-26 13:57, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi Noel,
>
> Noel Grandin wrote on 2013-02-26 12:23:
>
> > Using somewhere on the DocumentationFoundation  wiki to document this
> > might be friendlier to maintain, and easier to update since you don't
> > have to guess what it is already documented.
>
> the wiki was the first option we tried out, but several admins were 
> not overly happy with it, so we moved to RST files. From there, one 
> can create a wide range of supported formats, so it sounds like a good 
> choice.
>
> I personally don't mind in what form I receive documentation (although 
> RST is preferred, of course, since that lowers our amount of work) - 
> as long as I receive any documentation at all. It was quite shocking 
> to see how much stuff is running I wasn't even aware of at all...

Perhaps this might be of use?

    http://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Extension:RstToHtml

Then it could be maintained on the wiki, but in a format amenable to 
exporting to RST?

Just a suggestion, thanks for all the hard infrastructure work!


Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html



--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted