Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2013 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I think it's more for website and possibly marketing I think as this would
be for images that are used on the website right now and I noticed someone
requested one of the images that was on the website for some marketing
material

-----Original Message-----
From: lohmaier@googlemail.com [mailto:lohmaier@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of
Christian Lohmaier
Sent: 17 February 2013 13:00
To: Florian Effenberger
Cc: LibreOffice, website
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-website] RE: [Libreoffice-website] RE:
[Libreoffice-website] RE: [Libreoffice-website] Wiki upload issues [was
Libo4 Pages: new version 20130211]

Hi Florian, *,

On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Florian Effenberger
<floeff@documentfoundation.org> wrote:
Jonathan Aquilina wrote on 2013-02-17 12:00:

Florian someone had also mentioned using silver stripe. Seeing as 
that is already in place could that be a possibility as well?

I'm not sure. I think Silverstripe mainly serves media for its own 
sites, but then, we could easily create a subsite serving only files. 
I'd like to hear Christian Lohmaier's thoughts on that, he has most 
experience, I assume.

Silverstripe doesn't help organizing files by itself - by default it also
doesn't version files. There's modules that add the possibility to use
versions, but still that would only be exposed to editors by default, not to
regular visitors.

I didn't follow the thread closely, but I think the requirements include
that those versioned copies are also available for regular visitors.

While it is certainly possible to enhance the code to do so, it would be
retrofitting it. And due to the history of bad requirements provided by the
community, it will take long time to create it the way people would like it
:-)

What is easy is to have silverstripe provide a list of links for files in a
folder hierarchy. But there is nothing that would enforce a hierarchy for a
given file, let's say you download and edit file foo from category "writer",
then I'd expect it to go back to category "writer" - but doing that is all
up to the user who does upload the files.

For example I don't know what the problem with alfresco was. Only reason I
remember reading here was that people were more familiar with the other
platform for odfauthors.

Also I don't really know who will be using the "file-storage", and I really
lack a list of stuff that the file-storage should (would be
nice-to-have) and must (absolute requirement) be able to do.

ciao
Christian

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.