[libreoffice-website] Maintainers of the xx.libreoffice.org must be able to work more independently.

Hi.

Someone might judge me as unfair in some cases, but I just really want
to see this project succeed, so bare with me.

Anyway, I do have some things to pick on regarding the current situation
with SilverStripe CMS.

One of the greatest problems with the current situation is the nature of the
CMS, which obviously is not designed to be very dynamic and thus a lot
of the time it requires access to the server it runs on, and write access to
its files.

This is a major problem if something needs to be fixed ASAP and there's no
one around with access to do so. It also makes maintainers less independent
and leaves unnecessary work to people who probably could have done
without it.

Two examples would be the widget page RSS and Twitter capabilities. Both of
these are impossible to edit for an NL administrator. It might be that this
must be added individually in each project, but this is less than ideal and
not how it's done in general.

I therefore propose either approaching the SilverStripe devs and confront
them with the limitations, or move over to another system with a lot of
reference users.

– Olav

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/website/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted