Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index

On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 10:38 AM, Bernhard Dippold
<> wrote:
Please let us keep focused on the work at the moment. When the present site
is in a final state, the team has shown how it works and Drupal has lost
it's "red rag" meaning to some community members, we can consider all of
these possibilities. To keep the proposals in mind, they should be added to
the wiki.

Does this sound reasonable?

I fully agree with your statement. There are reasons we started
exploring the Drupal solution so early, however it is clear that we
need to look at what we have now in order to complete the simple
product marketing part of the site.

The 'rush' to get an initial code base and stable release has been
much faster than any of us expected. We need to keep up and meet our


Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
List archive:
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.