On 2011-01-19 1:16 AM, Michael Wheatland wrote:
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:38 PM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi Narayan, Michael :-)
The most recent SC meeting re-stated the same openess to that *in the
mid-term future*. But it was clearly desired to put an end to what has
become a disruptive argument backed up by what has been, IMHO,
disruptive disinformation about the SC's stance, in a quest to
"bulldoze" the adoption through.
You are incorrect. The development and discussions were as a result of
the official SC statement to the website mailing list:
Wow. Kind of demolishes the claims of how 'clear' everything was.
On 2011-01-19 5:42 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
I thought I had read apologies from Charles on the list.
Charles' 'apology' was nothing of the sort... in fact I consider it an
even bigger insult to Michael and the Drupal team than everything else
that happened... sorry, Charles', but I don't think that the problem was
a lack of 'barking orders' from you.
Anyway, I'm done (again) with this thread... hopefully the new
initiative that David and Michael are working on will enable the
community to outlive these growing pains.
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to email@example.com
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy