Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi all,
On 12/12/2010 11:47, Stefan Weigel wrote:
Hi Marc,

Am 12.12.2010 08:51, schrieb Marc Paré:

I am just going by what was declared by the SC starting here:

http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.website/592

These are self-explanatory.


Well:

<quote>
during our yesterday's call, the CMS decision was taken: it will be
Silverstripe as a starter, with plans to migrate to Drupal later on.
</quote>

To me, "plans to migrate to Drupal later on" does not necessarily
mean, that there actually will be a migration to Drupal.

And, the SCM minutes clearly read:

<quote>
suggestion is that the website team should do some more planning,
what we need regarding website, additional services, and see how
this can be achieved with drupal. We see the need of a more
sophisticated CMS in the future.
</quote>

To me, this means, that there has to be further evaluation and an
that migrating to drupal depends on a future decision by the SC.

Pse, don´t get me wrong: I am *not* against Drupal. But we should
recognize, what has been decided yet and what not.

Yes agreed, and if at the end of the day, Silverstripe does answer all our needs, I don't see why we should migrate to something else. BTW, currently what we would like is to see all the sites on line ;)

Kind regards
Sophie

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.