On Oct 11, 2010, at 4:22 PM, Per Eriksson wrote:
Some of the pros of OpenID are:
* No need to register additional accounts. Only the need to apply rights
to accounts in enabled systems.
* Saves time for the user.
* Can be reused by the user for other services outside TDF.
* Already several implementations for open source programming languages.
* Well-known
And some cons:
* Somewhat higher security risk. On the other hand, we don't store
financial data or something similar.
* If you get any problems with your account, it will affect all services.
What do others think? Do we have other technologies to concider? Or any
objections/additions to the list? :-)
I think OpenID would be a major benefit, and I know it would be
well-received by technical members. For the less geeky, I suggest we also
support Facebook Connect. In addition to the single sign-on benefits, it can
also propagate TDF activity out to members' activity streams and contacts.
As a presentation I recently attended suggested, "marketing should be
built-in to the product." In our case, we'd be facilitating a stream of TDF
related news back to Facebook by the simple act of participating (with user
approval), which means more, and more-continuous, promotion of our work.
This is sometimes called an "amplifier effect."
-Ben
Benjamin Horst
bhorst@mac.com
646-464-2314 (Eastern)
www.solidoffice.com
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org<website%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.