Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2010 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

I'm Keith.  I saw a post on the Drupal website that said libreoffice was
looking for a new website / wiki.  I'm curious as to what you are
considering.  I read this email and see that your looking at Wiki.  I work
with a lot of different systems (Drupal, Wordpress, Joomla, MediaWiki) and
may be able to give you a comparison of them if you want.  I understand
time, so here is my short opinion:

in no particular order:

Drupal = Good platform to provide a variety of different services and when
someone knows the system, its extremely easy to customize.  It also have the
ability to work with SVN/GIT/CVS as you can see from modules and themes on
drupal.org

Wordpress = quick setup low maintenance and easy to customize but not
designed for A LOT of people to use and isn't as robust as Drupal is for how
it handles information

Joomla = Probably not a viable option for this, it fall somewhere between
Drupal and Wordpress and i'm not sure it has anything this group would use

MediaWiki - Great wiki out of the box, can be customized, its fast, and
people know how to use it.  It doesn't have the modules and other features
that Drupal would have but it also doesn't need the configuration that
Drupal needs.

I guess another way to look at is that Ubuntu, and Drupal.org use drupal and
both of those have robust developer communities that are facilitated by the
community management features of Drupal.  I use Drupal because it has built
in features like CCK (GUI Forms) Views (GUI Reports / Data pages) and OG
(Group Managment), it provides most of the features out of the box that I
need.  If I need to customize something, its easy and its not hard to find
enthusiastic Drupal developers to help. ;-)

Anyway, I just thought i'd toss this out there and maybe it would help.

On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Benjamin Horst <bhorst@mac.com> wrote:

For anyone interested in the general topic of wikis, a Foswiki community
member suggested using the following page to compare and contrast different
engines. Here, for example, are MediaWiki and Foswiki side-by-side:

http://www.wikimatrix.org/compare/Foswiki+MediaWiki

While LibreOffice's wiki is now set up, this may become helpful in some
future circumstance.

-Ben

On Oct 7, 2010, at 2:54 PM, Christoph Noack wrote:

Hi Benjamin,

it seems that we have to hurry up. Things didn't stand still (although
some people might think so), and a wiki has been prepared in the
meantime. As I said yesterday, it should be available in no time - if we
"omit" the request for proper handling of languages ;-)

Thus, I'll forward your mail to the admins to make sure that they get
your statements, okay?

Am Donnerstag, den 07.10.2010, 13:35 -0400 schrieb Benjamin Horst:
Forwarding from the discuss@ list to the website@ list...

I like MediaWiki and use it extensively, including as an intranet wiki
at my current workplace. I recognize it's the default choice because
that's what OOo has been using and because it is well and
widely-known.

Also by admins :-) And by the current user base of the OOoWiki. So if we
change something, then we require really good arguments to convince
them ... it is like a migration of one major commercial office suite to
an open ... aehm ... libre one ;-)

However, it was not designed for the use-case of an intranet or
project management wiki. [...]

Foswiki: http://foswiki.org/
MoinMoin: http://moinmo.in/
DokuWiki: http://www.dokuwiki.org/
MediaWiki: http://www.mediawiki.org/

Wikipedia's list of wiki engines is here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_wiki_software
[...]

I tried to follow the CMS discussion today, and what me puzzles is, that
we require a wiki very soon and the time for people evaluating another
installation is also very limited, sigh. How to balance "get a good
wiki" and "get a wiki soon"?

Another thing I'd like to consider is, that we have some content that
might be migrated from the OOoWiki ... I wrote many proposals and
requirement specifications I'd like to add to LibO, too. But this is my
problem at the moment :-)

I'd like to suggest this mailing list work on the information
architecture for the forthcoming project site and wiki, in parallel to
our other threads investigating CMS and wiki platforms to build upon.

My proposal: Let's ask the others for some comments ... and maybe our
intermediate but heroic admins like Florian or Guy, or Christian will
join.

Bye,
Christoph

[...]

--
To unsubscribe, send an empty e-mail to
website+unsubscribe@libreoffice.org<website%2Bunsubscribe@libreoffice.org>
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot
be deleted.



Benjamin Horst
bhorst@mac.com
646-464-2314 (Eastern)
www.solidoffice.com


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org<website%2Bhelp@libreoffice.org>
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted.




-- 
*Thought Farm Productions <http://www.thoughtfarmproductions.com>
thoughtfarm@thoughtfarmproductions.com*
*(201) 691-7057*

-- 
To unsubscribe, e-mail to website+help@libreoffice.org
List archives are available at http://www.libreoffice.org/lists/website/
All messages you send to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.