Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
August 2020 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501

--- Comment #63 from Rizal Muttaqin <riz_17_oke@yahoo.co.id> ---
(In reply to Samuel Mehrbrodt (CIB) from comment #62)
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #33)
@Samuel, I know Thorsten is leaning in favor--but what do you believe as to
fitness of any of the NB to become default UI. And, if default were to be
moved onto NB then how much remains to be done with the framework?

I do think that one variant of those can become the default UI (probably the
tabbed one).
But before that can happen we need to have
* proper customization support (not what we have now which *copies* the
whole UI file to the user profile (which causes issues like bug 135495)).
* proper extension support (Extensions must be able to register new buttons
in existing Notebookbars and also register new tabs with their own layout)
(* support for Notebookbar in all LO apps)



For me it's strange if we demand this two after we set the interface (in this
case Tabbed UI) out of experimental. To my mind taking out something from
experimental mode do have mean that the feature is considerably stable and get
ready for user and third party developer to work on.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.