[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 134781] Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781

--- Comment #13 from ajlittoz <page74010-sf@yahoo.fr> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #10)
> Or maybe instead moved into the existing "User-defined" type, as additional
> checkbox "[x] Category (number range):" plus the Category and Display list
> boxes.

I've seldom used "User-Defined". Apart from "Styles" and "Index marks" options,
it looks like the other possibilities are related to what we can see in the
Navigator. They allow to finely select the Tables, Frames, OLE Objects. I don't
know how to understand Graphics: does this map to Images and Drawing objects in
the Navigator?

This interrogation of mine shows it is not clear.

There may be an overlap with the Object mode of "Table of Figures"/"Index of
Tables". Once again, I haven't experimented but it is likely that this object
mode will end up with all the named objects of the Navigator. Therefore, the
"User-Defined" is likely to be preferable to "Tables …"/"Index …" for
fine-grain control.

As a "simple" user, I prefer several "Type" selection covering targeted
purposes (table of X) rather than a catch-all User-Defined with too many
checkboxes, resulting in visual clutter and possibly difficulty to understand
what to check to get the desired result.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.