https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134781
--- Comment #12 from ajlittoz <page74010-sf@yahoo.fr> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #9)
An own mode, dedicated to list the number range elements seems
a good option, at the same time simplifying the UI for the two modes in
question.
A question whether some/all modes should provide an option to make
alphabetical lists with grouping is a separate IMO, and should not be
considered along with this one in the same issue.
Also a question about having hyperlinks for table lists by default is a
separate, with no clear reason not to have them.
Excellent conclusion, three separate issues.
The second one may wait because it does not exist today and nobody will feel
frustrated as they did without till now.
The third one is a mystery but the workaround if to use "Table of Figures" for
hyperlinks and "Index of Tables" if they are not needed. Anyway, you can also
modify the Structure line (removing LS/LE in "Table …" or adding them in "Index
…" because the button is present.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 134781] Redundancy in Table of Contents and Indexes · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.