https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124871
--- Comment #2 from Tony Durham <anthonydurham@gmail.com> ---
Thanks Heike for looking at this idea. I totally get the problem with ODF.
Obviously ODF has its own update cycle, and new features can, over time, be
incorporated. But the ODF standard group (I don't know its formal name)isn't
going to mandate a new feature like this one, without substantial support from
the office software companies. And I suspect the software companies aren't
deluged with user requests for a cyclic cell-addressing mode.
So, like a lot of these things, it's chicken and egg.
Meanwhile, I'll hope someone invents a time machine, so I can go back to 1978
and have a word with Dan Bricklin and Bob Frankston. If I am successful, you
won't notice anything changing. Cyclic addressing will be the way it always
was. (And this conversation won't have happened.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 124871] Proposed enhancement: a CYCLIC ADDRESSING mode for cells and ranges CALC, EDITING, UI · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.