https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104047
--- Comment #7 from Yousuf Philips (jay) <philipz85@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6)
Palettes in general are useful, and the LibreOffice branding in particular
for us. You will know Microsoft graphics, for instance, by the ugly Excel
design and their colors. We'd loose our identity without own colors that
makes LibO documents unique. Actually I would made this the standard but
haven't thought about bug 87538. Today we use "Tango: Sky Blue 1" very often
(despite the bad name it's not our branding what we use).
The 32-colors of the LibreOffice palette is available in the standard palette,
so there isnt a need for a palette that only has the LibreOffice branded colors
in it. You can find 'Tango: Sky Blue 1' as the second last color in the
standard palette.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.