https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104047
--- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #5)
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
Could live with Tango but not without LibO as our own branding palette.
How is a brand palette useful to the regular user?
Palettes in general are useful, and the LibreOffice branding in particular for
us. You will know Microsoft graphics, for instance, by the ugly Excel design
and their colors. We'd loose our identity without own colors that makes LibO
documents unique. Actually I would made this the standard but haven't thought
about bug 87538. Today we use "Tango: Sky Blue 1" very often (despite the bad
name it's not our branding what we use).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.