https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92458
--- Comment #3 from Björn Michaelsen <bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> ---
(In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #2)
Though the human theme isnt bundled by default with libreoffice, it is the
default icon theme used for LO in Ubuntu and its flavours, except Kubuntu,
so i'd assume it would be good to make sure that Canonical doesnt have an
issue with this.
Right. I would really not enjoy killing the Human theme, as likely it would
just mean that I would need to carry it as a cumbersome vendor patch anyway,
just creating lots of pointless work along the way.
What is the point/goal of this anyway? The human theme can be turned off by a
configure switch and IIRC isnt even enabled by default. If the goal is to make
Ubuntu ship a different default, this certainly isnt the way towards that goal
(see above).
If you want a different default in Ubuntu, the way to go about that is filing a
request on launchpad at Ubuntu and get that nodded of by Ubuntus design team.
(As a general note this bug doesnt seem to be too well scoped: it describes no
clear goal and mixes too many things: removing themes, adding themes, changing
defaults with the latter being off-topic here beyond TDF builds.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Context
- [Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 92458] Kill the “Human” theme and integrate “elementary” · bugzilla-daemon
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.