Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
December 2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87613

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vstuart.foote@utsa.edu

--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote@utsa.edu> ---
Agree with Cor, alphabetizing probably does not gain much for the UX. And adds
a whole lot of work to implement alpha sort consistently for all l10n/i18n.

Q: Rather than alphabetizing of our labels, would standardizing our listbox
ordering with groupings more closely following the sequence of the SMIL 2.0
transition taxonomy (ref) by type and sub-type (which would of course be
language neutral) provide a more consistent UI? 

On the transition listbox--"No transition" would remain the top item, and place
"Random transition" next. Then follow in listing ordered as groped by the SMIL
2.0 type and sub-type?

-=ref=-
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/smil-transitions.html#TransitionEffects-Appendix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.