Hi there,
On Mon, 2012-12-17 at 09:24 +0100, Jean-Baptiste Faure wrote:
Who has the right to decide how many folder levels the user should use
to organize his own data ?
The UX team are broadly responsible for making our product as easy to
use as possible - so in the end they are responsible :-) We discuss that
stuff here.
Please don't sacrifice 80% of our users for the 5% sado-masochists
that like organising things into folders.
Please provide references supporting that statement.
In my experience few people provide academic and rigorous references
for every point they make in a discussion, nor is it that reasonable to
ask for them :-) To be sure the above is written in rather a stark
way ;-) you can be a non-sado-masochist and still use folders (I do
myself) - but they seem to be non-optimal design metaphors.
I like Cedric's compromise: if we have to deal with structured
hierarchical storages remotely - then it is going to be hard to do that
without showing that hierarchy somehow. Then again - we should clearly
strive to make it as easy as possible for users locally: with nicely
organised flat presentations and search (if that's what the UX guys are
advising).
That's my 2 cents anyhow,
HTH,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.