Hi everyone,
Needless to say, I didn't want to send the last mail the way I did.
Sorry. Sometimes I am not the master of my hands (or my keyboard), it
seems.
Could it be a good idea to just copy Scribus's behaviour [1]? It gives
you buttons for
[New] [Clone]
[Import] [Delete]
where "New" always creates a new empty style (that is, a copy of the
default style) and "Clone" creates a copy of the currently selected
style (btw, I like "Duplicate", as initially proposed by Olivier, much
better as a name for the button). Inheritances can then be defined
later on.
From Regina's mail:
You need inheritance from the beginning to fill the fields with the
inherited values. That there is no visual distinction between inherited
and set values is a different problem.
I am not sure I get this completely, Regina.
# I think it would be quite possible to just copy the entire default
style when using [New]. Also, of course, every style created via [New]
would then inherit from the default style I suppose, every style has
to depend on something).
# Every style created with [Duplicate] (or [Clone]) would inherit from
the same style the original style inherited from.
From Rafael's mail (and my answer to it):
> I believe Astron's own proposal on the Paragraph Style window addresses this
in an elegant way
Sure, it solves a few problems and extending the list box with eg grey
text for inherited definitions might be an okay visualisation...
I am actually not so sure my idea with the grey text is realistic any
more, because in the case of a dependency on the default style that
would probably be a mass of definitions. Maybe expandable separators
between those areas would help.
Yet, the problem for most people is that they have never extensively
worked with styles and might not understand intricacies like
inheritances. I think most people don't have any understanding of
technologies like CSS etc.,
I am not sure knowledge of CSS basics is necessary but I am pretty
sure it helps.
Btw, I would be incredibly glad if any would want to work on my
Organiser tab redesign :) (and I am willing to assist of course).
Regina again:
I would like to get the linking feature to the page style too, so that
e.g. changing the margin in the parent style will also change the margin
in the child style. Often there are only little differences between
parent and child.
Agree.
You can it see the other way round too. Cloning is first "new with
inheritance" and then "breaking the link".
For inexperienced users, both cloning and linking should be shown, so
that he has the chance to learn, that there is a feature "linking".
+1. I am up for easing the general comprehension of the way styles work.
I see what you mean and I think I agree. Both features should exist,
but they must be named clearly. But I think the emphasis should be put
on making "duplicating" easy/more visible.
Those inexperienced users will not use styles, far less create own styles.
Yes, but it should be our aim to make it easy to create good-looking
documents with LibO and while you don't need styles for that, they
certainly help create consistency. This is why we should also target
inexperienced users.
So we have the possible behaviors
(1) Generate a totally new, independent style
The question is, from where it gets its settings. I see extreme ways
(a) Use only default settings, nothing in organizer
(z) Use an existing style and set all properties as own settings in the new style. Very
full organizer.
Perhaps something in between
(m) Copy those settings from an existing style, that are not equal to defaults.
(2) Generate a child style, which has no own settings in the beginning
Okay, I'll try to specify this now:
[New]
# inherit from "default style" (user can change this later)
# no new definitions (empty organiser, except for, as proposed above,
the separators indicating inherited definitions)
[Duplicate]
# inherit from the same style the original style inherited from
# copy all definitions from the original style
Regards,
Astron.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.