[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- From: Sophie <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 13:55:11 +0200
- To: firstname.lastname@example.org
Le 01/10/2014 12:27, Tanstaafl a écrit :
> *Anytime* a long standing feature is totally ripped out and replaced
> with something else that causes a major regression, it should be an
> absolute top priority to fix it in the very next release. In fact, I
> would say that it should be a part of the agreement that any contributor
> signs, that if they are the one responsible for a regression like this,
> they are *required* to fix it asap.
Why should a volunteer fix the bug for your company? Very strange way to
see the LibreOffice ecosystem.
> So, for us, 4.2 and 4.3 are *both* unstable - meaning, we *cannot use
> them*, because they lack a very basic capability that we have relied on
> since, oh, I don't know... version 1?
So help to fix it instead of ranting here and on the issue, volunteers
won't act quicker because you rant about their work. Joel has took the
time to explain you on the issue how it works.
> In case you were wondering, it is the new 'Inline Fields' functionality,
> that when introduced, broke the ability to paste into them, and the bug
> is still there today, in 4.3.2.
Sophie Gautier email@example.com
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
- Prev by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: problems with the spell checker
- Next by Date: Re: [libreoffice-users] How to handle regressions
- Previous by thread: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?
- Next by thread: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still?