Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Very few people know this, but OS/2 Warp was light years ahead of
current Windows products with its speech technology.

On Fri, 2011-06-17 at 17:55 -0400, Eric S. Johansson wrote:

On 6/17/2011 5:12 PM, planas wrote:
The current problem is we do not have any good information of what
features are not very important and do not extend the functionality for
all but a few users. The question is what mix of included and extensible
features should be available beyond those that are important. One of the
problems is you need either a lot different users surveyed at the same
time or smaller number surveyed over a longer period of time. For
example, most of the time I do not use a table of contents in my
documents but when I need the feature I must have it. How many people
need this feature irregularly versus those that often use it? I do not
know.

this reminds be of a conversation I had with Microsoft people back in 2000. I'm 
disabled, I use speech recognition and quite frankly liberated office is not 
terribly speech recognition friendly (including its name). The conversation I 
was having with Microsoft was about speech enabling Microsoft Word. They kept 
coming up with these really huge unmanageable grammars to try and make every GUI 
elements accessible. I said "but I only use 10% of word" to which they replied 
"so does everybody else. The problem is they all use a different 10%"

I don't know if it's comfort to know that you're suffering from the same 
problems as Microsoft Word and there really isn't a very good way to solve the 
problem.

What I do in a speech interface is I try very hard to isolate grammars based on 
context and maybe that's the kind of thing you need to do. Yes, you will have 
cases where you have two ways of saying the same thing in two different contexts 
but it can't be helped.

and for what it's worth, to do good speech user interface (i.e. not something 
nuance gives you), it's becoming apparent to me that you need a backdoor 
interface giving read/write access to all GUI/plug-in accessible data. Then the 
speech user interface can present the information and operations in a UI 
appropriate context.



-- 
Roland Hughes, President
Logikal Solutions
(630)-205-1593

http://www.theminimumyouneedtoknow.com
http://www.infiniteexposure.net

No U.S. troops have ever lost their lives defending our ethanol
reserves.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+help@global.libreoffice.org
In case of problems unsubscribing, write to postmaster@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.