[libreoffice-users] in response ...

       ... this message was waiting for 2 days to be released to the list;

              when I opened it to see if it was junk or not, I was
surprised to see that someone had posted a query.

       Since I thought I might be able to help, I responded to it.

       I responded to the original message, merely deleting the non-list
data,
              so I really do not understand what thread was broken.

       with all sincerity, & confused by your attitude,



From: Brian Barker <b.m.barker@btinternet.com>
Date: Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: Access to Libre Office files
To: Anne Noname <laginnis@gmail.com>
Cc: "Charles-H. Schulz" <charles.schulz@documentfoundation.org>


At 09:43 30/01/2017 -0600, Anne Noname wrote:

> From: Gareth Walters <garethwalters@myphone.coop>
> > To: users@global.libreoffice.org
> > Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2017 12:11:05 +0000 (GMT)
> > Subject: [libreoffice-users] Lacl of Access to Libre Office files
> >
> > Good morning. ...
>
> maybe I can help - ...

You are doing it again!

Please, when you are asked to moderate an incoming message, your choices
are to permit it to be posted or not. Whichever you choose, you may, of
course, wish to reply yourself. But if you reply to a message that you
allow to go to the list, you need to reply to the copy that you will then
get from the list, not the original secret copy you received. Doing it the
wrong way wrecks the threading and confuses people. You owe it to them to
get it right.

Would you release the original message, please?

Brian Barker - privately

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted