Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2016 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 22/12/16 04:01 AM, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 21/12/2016 à 23:56, Gary Dale a écrit :

The behaviour you describe is reported as :

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34585

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=62505

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=20209

https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=32724

One can see from the OOo bug reports that there was already a call to
have NoFill equate to 100% transparency, even back then.



Alex
Merci. It makes me wonder why anyone thought the current behaviour was somehow a good idea. :(


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.