Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 08/24/2015 02:28 PM, Aurelius Octavian wrote:
Thank you Stephan for the hint. Dependency's profiling the "soffice.bin"
execution from within Java worked and I got a longer log.
However, since I'm no C(++) or Windows programmer I wouldn't know where
to search for a bug in the Java64->UNO->Libreoffice64 process.

Would somebody like to take a quick look at the log file, please? It's
here:
http://pastebin.com/v1x5sEUM

Or are there people in the Libreoffice developer team who know more
about this whole UNO thing, in order to spot the error when LO 64-Bit is
being called from Java 64-Bit?

My suspicion would be that, when spawned from the java.exe process, soffice.bin runs in some subtly altered environment that e.g. causes it to pick up unexpected instances of certain DLLs---something like picking an MSVCRT DLL that is suitable for the java.exe but not for soffice.bin, or similar.

However, I at least cannot spot any obvious issue in your pastebin, unfortunately.

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.