Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2015 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi,

while LO does allow a certain amount of customisation, at this point in the game this particular menu option can not be changed.

This then becomes a feature request, either

 * change the default
 * allow the sort options to be customised

Once a feature request is submitted it is really up to a (unpaid) programmer to step forward and take on the action. I can't see this being high on the programmer's list of priorities but it may be deemed an "easy hack" which an aspiring young person could field.

Cheers




On 26/03/15 10:58, Richard VINCK wrote:
Tim Lloyd
Thank you for pointing this. Indeed, unticking it works then correctly.
But it should be the default, and should remain unticked. (and should be more visible, as it is hidden in the Option tab)
Can we make it as default?

On 2015-03-26 00:42, Tim Lloyd wrote:
A quick look at the doco reveals...

Range contains column/row labels
– omits the first row or the first column in the selection from the sort

Untick this box and you are sorted.

Cheers

On 26/03/15 10:06, Wade Smart wrote:
Hmm I just tried to sort going through the
sort menu and I still cant get it to sort
properly.

It does numbers just fine though.
--
Registered Linux User: #480675
Registered Linux Machine: #408606
Linux since June 2005


On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:04 PM, Wade Smart <wadesmart@gmail.com> wrote:
**cough cough** .. feature understood.
--
Registered Linux User: #480675
Registered Linux Machine: #408606
Linux since June 2005


On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:02 PM, Michael Tiernan
<michael.tiernan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 3/25/15 6:53 PM, Wade Smart wrote:
I have 4.2.7.2 on Ubuntu 14.04 and you are correct, sort is not working.
When I reported it, I provided a great deal of information about it and was told "Not a bug" and "works for me" by those who have the power to
close bugs.

My argument was/is that if you use the sort arrows (as you have done
here) then you're asking/telling LO to sort the selected rows with no
options.

Instead it was deemed correct that instead, LO assumes the first cell
found is used as a label regardless of any other settings.

This "feature" (*cough*) cost me a number of hours of work to get around
and avoid.

The argument is that since you can use the "Sort" menu option and change this behavior *for each sort occurrence* then there's a work around for
the "feature" and we should be happy with that.

--
   << MCT >> Michael C Tiernan. http://www.linkedin.com/in/mtiernan
   Non Impediti Ratione Cogatationis
   Women and cats will do as they please, and men and dogs
    should relax and get used to the idea. -Robert A. Heinlein


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted






--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.