Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


@Rob, *,

Rob Jasper wrote
I think this is really well explained.

I've been professionally involved in defect reporting for years, and the
problems seem to be the same in all organisations.

Problems in defect reporting:
1- Qualification of type (A bug is unexpected behaviour which does not
comply to the requirements; An enhancement request is new development
which changes both requirements and code)
2- Severity (How serious is the bug/enhancement request from users
perspective)
3- Priority (What is the priority with respect to other bug/enhancement
reports)

Neither of these I see in out bugzilla defect reporting...

There should be a moderator (not a developer) to map out the priority. One
can set out rather strict rules for this, think about amount of complaints
for the same, file corruption, system crash, etc.
If we would go along these lines we might get away with the tension
between (expert-) users and developers.

But again, good effort here to get things ironed out,
Thanks Tom,

Rob.

Actually, the LibreOffice project is rather well organized in this
regard--please review the QA Wiki here:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA

QA is a distinct entity to Development--and while there is certainly some
cross over,  the developers are not moderators of the process. That falls to
the Engineering Steering Committee with input from the entire community--QA
team, UX and Design team, Documentation team,
Localization/Internationalization team, Marketing team and the occasional
needs of TDF board.

So, always room to participate. Please start as Tom suggested by loading a
current build of the 4.4.0 build, or a daily Tinderbox of master and test
there.   

We can always use additional help with the QA process--get a login on our 
FDO hosted Bugzilla instance <https://bugs.freedesktop.org/>   and dive in,
plenty of  triage work to go around.

Regards,

Stuart



--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Comments-on-pdf-file-size-in-4-4-alpha-and-a-new-bug-tp4129842p4130104.html
Sent from the Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.