Le 30/09/2014 16:12, Tanstaafl a écrit :
On 9/30/2014 8:54 AM, Charles-H. Schulz
I am sorry to say this, but what is ridiculous here is the inability of
some to even understand what is being discussed.
Oh, I understand what is being discussed.
What you don't understand is the complaint.
Fresh is not testing. It has never been "testing".
I'm not arguing about what 'Fresh' relates to.
I'm saying that creating these totally new, never before head of terms
to describe different branches of software - ie, 'Fresh', 'Still' etc -
rather than using some standard terms/terminology that actually are used
by many different projects (admittedly, there is some amount of
variation) - ie, 'Stable', 'Testing', 'Development' - is what is ridiculous.
But those doesn't exist anywhere else, because we are not producing a
distro but a desktop software and the concept is completely different.
And yet, this is something that you don't want to ear.
Use STANDARD terms, then precisely define THOSE.
Which are certainly not stable, testing and development.
If you really insist on having two different 'Stable' branches, then
name them something like 'Stable-New' and 'Stable-Old' or something else
that makes much more sense than 'Still' or 'Fresh.
Then, do you think that those two stable won't confuse the users?
Of course, if you just enjoy *creating* confusion, then by all means,
continue reinventing terms with new ones that no one understands and
sound silly on top of it all.
I don't think that anybody contributing in this project wants to lose
users and contributors time. Each time, we explain and discuss to try to
find the best way to resolve and further things.
Sophie Gautier email@example.com
Co-founder - Release coordinator
The Document Foundation
To unsubscribe e-mail to: firstname.lastname@example.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still? · john herron
Re: [libreoffice-users] Re: LibreOffice Still? · Tom Davies
Impressum (Legal Info)
: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our trademark policy