Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2014 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi :)
Nope, it;s the standard way these mailing lists have behaved for a long
time now.

It used to be that people could just click on "Reply to" and their message
would go straight to the mailing list.  Now most email-clients require
people to click on "Reply to all ..." and the mailing list's address is
only in the "CC" rather than in the "To" field.  Numerous people have
grumbled about it in here but few bother to post a complaint to the
postmaster address and those that do just seem to get agro for it.

One person here did try to show how he re-configured his own email-client
to get around the problem and a few of the other longer-term people here
might well have followed his lead but i am not sure what effect that sort
of thing has on non-LO emails.  Also i kinda believe in the "Eat your own
dog food" principle so that i stay in touch with the problems normal users
have when they first approach this mailing list.
Regards from
Tom :)






On 25 August 2014 13:56, Paul <paulsteyn1@afrihost.co.za> wrote:

Well, Maurice quoted from my mail, so I'm pretty sure he did receive it.

Btw: Tom, your mail was addressed to me directly, and CCd to the group,
causing my default reply-to to go to just you (luckily I noticed in
time). Not sure why this happens for some messages, did you do anything
differently for your message?


On Mon, 25 Aug 2014 13:41:14 +0100
Tom Davies <tomcecf@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi :)
I suspect that Paul's post below has not yet arrived in Maurice's
time-line.

Email threads sometimes get a bit disjointed, especially if an
over-enthusiastic junk/spam-filter tends to carefully reject anything
with any hint of code in it!  However it could easily be that someone
starts from their older messages and work forwards to newer and newer
ones instead of the more sensible approach (imo) of working from the
newest posts backwards to the oldest.  By starting with the newest
ones first i often find that older posts have already been dealt with
and can thus be safely ignored even if they stir-up side-issues
(which also might have already been largely dealt with).


On the other hand it might be good if someone could test Paul's
script. Perhaps it's possible to combine the 2 ideas so that both the
file-name AND the few lines of surrounding text could be output?
Would that help?  Also it might be good to have the output directed
into a file rather than just onto the command-line?

I really like Don Pobanz's answer and the way Paul was able to help
tweak it.  It felt like a return to what this mailing list is largely
about = collaborating to build-up a better answer faster than the
individuals had time to do on their own.  Good work!! :)))
Regards from
Tom :)



On 24 August 2014 19:29, Paul <paulsteyn1@afrihost.co.za> wrote:

Try changing the line:

     unzip -ca "$file" content.xml | grep -ql "$1"

to:

     unzip -ca "$file" content.xml | grep -qC 10 "$1"

the "-l" to grep makes it show only the names of files that match,
not the content. The "-C #" gives # lines of context around the
match. Or you could use "-B #" and "-A #" to print # lines of
leading and trailing conext, respectively.

You could also make a script to pull the contents of all the files
and concatenate them in such a way that you can use Writer to do
find inside one big document, but that would be considerably
harder. Try this first.


Paul



Disclaimer: I haven't actually tested this, just done a "man grep",
but I think the syntax is right...




On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 18:16:35 +0000 (UTC)
Maurice <maurice@bcs.org.uk> wrote:

On Sun, 24 Aug 2014 11:44:31 -0500, Don Pobanz wrote:

I find it very useful for finding a word or phrase within my odt
documents.

Thank you, Don, but that only shows which files contain the
search string. (It's likely that all files in the list will
contain at least one occurrence of the string.)

That would be a start, but what I am looking for is a means of
seeing the string as if Writer was showing the file contents, so
that I can see the surrounding text.

(Equivalent to joining all the doc's into one big file, then
doing a Find.   Perhaps I shall have to do the joining
manually...)



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive:
http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/ All messages sent
to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted




--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
deleted



-- 
To unsubscribe e-mail to: users+unsubscribe@global.libreoffice.org
Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/users/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.